Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Terre'Blanche the Terrible

Eugene Terre’Blanche was and in his death continues to be a man of contradictions. Contradictions within himself as well as surrounded by contradictory views of him. Denis Beckett’s article, “Eugene, the arch-ogre” highlights only too well these contradictions, despite being written 30 years prior to Terre’Blanche’s death. According to Beckett, Terre’Blanche was a man who, although he appeared to have the best interests of his “volk” and family at heart as well as deeply entrenched Christian morals, still believed in fighting and the use of violence and racism, even though he vehemently denied this.
Terre’Blanche was murdered on 3 April 2010 and the public and government’s reactions to his murder are distinctly mixed. Terre’Blanche was seen by the Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweeging (AWB) supporters and his other supporters as a hero. He was regarded by them as some kind of god, who would fight for their plight, and according to Beckett, Terre’Blanche clearly thought this about himself too. But there are those who are rejoicing in the death of Terre’Blanche, calling him a murderer, a racist and questioning his ‘Christian’ motives.
It is ironic that Terre’Blanche was killed by two black farm workers, at a time when ANC youth League president, Julius Malema, has been singing and encouraging ‘freedom songs’ such as “Kill the Boer, kill the farmer.”
We will never know now whether Terre’Blanche’s ideas and motives were based on a truly moralistic and wish for a better country as a whole, or on racist and separatist ideals that would ultimately benefit only the white Afrikaner “volk.”

3 comments:

  1. A very thought-provoking piece. In what ways were the governments reactions mixed though? I would have liked to know more about their stance and also to have seen an expansion on the Julius Malema incident.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree that Terre Blanche was a man of many contradictions. It is difficult to pin point exactly whether he is a good guy or a bad one. We tend to hear sort of 'horror' stories about him, yet from Denis Beckett's article it is difficult to see him as a complete villain. Either way I think it is time we got over him. He is dead, yet he is still making the news.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A very thought-provoking piece. In what ways were the governments reactions mixed though? I would have liked to know more about their stance and also to have seen an expansion on the Julius Malema incident.
    (Crazy Dan is my other profile, so confued.)

    ReplyDelete